Windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free -
Looking for:
Windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free |
Windows Server | Microsoft.Microsoft Windows Server Version Comparison
Windows NT - Wikipedia.Windows Server Comparison of editions and features – 4sysops
Time to kick another wasp nest! I got so many nice comments after the last time. Of course, things have changed since then. Hyper-V has scaled out again, and VMware has announced vSphere 5.
Given windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free factsyou have to question that sort of opinion. Actually, Microsoft has already done quite a bit of that for us with a new comparison document that was released overnight.
Keep in по этому сообщению that the Hyper-V features and scalability are identical across all of the editions:.
And remember that ESXi free does not include Failover Clustering; you must have vSphere to have failover application up time. That would mean there would be VMs on each host in the cluster.
The fact is that you save money hardware, licensing, power, space by scaling up first, and then out. You minimize risk by using guest clusters. A massive piece of the investment for Microsoft was storage, trying to scale out, offer new solutions, and to alleviate problems that exist in all sizes of business. In a cloud, you need scalable for big data and flexible storage solution. Using passthrough or RDM disks is an oxymoron in the cloud because it completely removes the element of self-service.
VHDX is also the only 4K aligned virtual hard disk. The memory optimization approach is one of:. The only other difference is QoS for networking. Hyper-V has a clear windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free.
Microsoft probably had the advantage here because they did come at this later in the game. Looking at how they designed the virtual network previous to the virtual switch in Hyper-V, you can see that there was a long term vision. The new virtual switch is a layer 2, programmatically managed device with lots more functionality than was in the older virtual network.
One of the key features is по этому адресу. Rather than replacing the virtual switch, we can stack third party windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free on the switch.
VMware has 2 partners 3 partners, including the heralded Cisco solution, that replace the VMware virtual switch. Cisco has 2 solutions for WS Hyper-V. Heh … a dinosaur like IBM who still thinks Прощения, adobe illustrator cs5 iso free что Notes is king of the email world with dreadful support as a partner. Make of that what you want. Through the здесь, you can see that Hyper-V has more functionality, and it is built-in, ready to use, with no additional licensing.
Network Performance Enhancements. More work went into this by Microsoft, to improve existing features and to also make the most of new available hardware. Anyone who wants network security for their applications will want to turn it on. Hyper-V does not include features that prevent Live Migration. My cousin works in the IT security world, often doing some very weird things.
When I first got into virtualisation, he had an interesting observation: Virtualisation assumes you have amazing physical security and you can trust your operators. That means that data in the computer room is easier to steal than ever. That means the data is only visible to anyone who can log into the hosts. WS Hyper-V supports encrypting clustered disks too. Hyper-V offers more flexibility, the number 2 reason cost savings is number 1 for companies to adopt virtualisation, and a key requirement for a cloud.
Eric Gray, who poses as an independent blogger on his vCritical blog, but is actually a marketing employee of VMware working for their compete group, has tried in the past windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free belittle the simultaneous Live Migration features of WS Hyper-V.
I had a read, and some of the commentators on the post called him out nicely. I especially loved the one that said I was getting under the skin of VMware. Big hosts have lots of memory and lots of VMs. Maybe we can limit it to 8 vMotions on 10 GbE. But enterprise datacenters might want to use bigger networking. I can see how it might be much bigger with more network capacity … in the sorts of large enterprise data centres that would embrace Infiniband.
A multi-tenant public cloud hosting must support the migration of VMs and software defined networking SDN. This is a built-in feature in WS Hyper-V. Hyper-V has Hyper-V Replica for free. VMware now include some sort of replication that I know zip about.
SRM does the vSphere orchestration. I know a certain book that will teach you all about that. Beware the FUD on this one. The vFanboys are all windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free the orchestration right now and they are quite simply wrong because I can orchestrate Hyper-V Replica windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free now.
No competition here. Hyper-V is free. You can learn how to license Windows Server VMs legally using my recent post. That means you get all of what Hyper-V does for free. Choosing to run vSphere 5. Of course, you can choose to spend more money for a collection receently acquired confusing VMware point solutions. You can do just about everything in PowerShell, enabling easy and rapid deployment or configuration change without rampant time consuming and mind numbing hammering of a mouse.
And I know a certain book …. I had to Google it. I never hear it being talked about. I know nothing about it other than it looked very basic compared to the power of PowerShell in my quick glimpse.
I have to give a significant decision in favour of WS Hyper-V here because of the ability to rapidly change or manage an environment with a few or windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free thousands of virtual machines from a single line of PowerShell. The facts speak for themselves. WS Hyper-V does more, scales out more, is build as the foundation for an enterprise cloud, and is effectively free.
You can go ahead and use vSphere 5. Please read the original Microsoft document that I took the tables from where you will find much more detail.
Now go take a look at what Gartner thinks. Wow, amazing effort. I would like to use these information in my persentation and need your approval. Hi Mohamed, Thanks for asking. Is there anything built-in in VMware? It is good to see these comparisons coming out, but it would be better if the author showed all of the capabilities of both products so we can see what VMware provides that Microsoft does not.
It seems to me that the article is only comparing Microsoft to VMware where they provide the same features. Have you any experience with that?
Very excited about Hyper-V here. One question I did have was that currently, in Hyper-V you cannot expand a virtual disk while it is in use. The Guest must be shutdown first. While this might seem a low level item, windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free something that is done a lot opertionally and is possible with VMWare.
That old scenario of a file server running страница of space and just dynamically adding another GB to the virtual disk without ссылка на страницу to shut it down. And any known plans in an upcoming Service Pack to change this? I windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free from experience with RHEL v5.
No, Not true. Now want to shift to WS and phase out vmware. Are there any pitfalls for this migration? Is it possible seamlessly? Any V2V conversion requires a conversion process with downtime for the VMs. The 5nine one gets some good reviews. Really useful writeup. Thank you. The only thing I see missing from Hyper-V is Hot-add of Memory and processors which I have used in the past for vSphere in a hi performance production environment.
That seems to windows server 2012 datacenter vs standard comparison free the only negative from the hypervisor. Your email address will not be нажмите сюда. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Skip to content Time to kick another wasp nest! I got so many nice comments after the last time In a previous postI documented the comparison of Windows Server Hyper-V with vSphere 5.
Comments
Post a Comment